Negotiation Boot Camp Home Page

Negotiation Skills Seminars

Sales Negotiation Seminars

Negotiating Webinars

Negotiation Keynotes by Ed Brodow

Negotiation Boot Camp Clients

Biography of Negotiation Skills Expert Ed Brodow

Negotiation Boot Camp Books and DVDs

Negotiation Boot Camp Articles

Negotiation Boot Camp Demo Video


Negotiation Boot Camp Article by Ed Brodow
Articles

Sales Negotiation:
The Salesperson's Dilemma

by Ed Brodow

Ed Brodow - Sales Negotiation expertIn sales negotiations, customer price objections can be seductive. You want the sale and the customer is giving you an easy way to close it: offer a discount. However, there are two essential reasons for resisting the objections and sticking to your price:

First, closing the sale means nothing if it is not profitable. Many fine companies have gone out of business after deciding to offer major discounts. Profitability is a more realistic way of measuring success than sales volume.

Second, the most satisfied customers in a sales negotiation are the ones who pay top dollar because they appreciate the value of their investment. Buyers perceive higher-priced items to be more valuable. (Think Mercedes-Benz, Rolex, and Giorgio Armani.) In my selling career, the best customers have always been the ones who have paid full price, and the most unhappy ones have been the buyers who received a discount.

Shortly after I started my speaking and training business, I received a call from Susan, a manager at a Fortune 500 company. "We want you to train a large group of our key employees in negotiation skills," she said. "I've seen your work and I think you're the best."

I was certainly very excited, as this account would be worth about $50,000. I was about to ask Susan where I should fax the contract when she dropped a bomb. "You should know," she went on, "that my boss likes somebody else, and that company is less expensive than you are. If you lower your fee, I think we can get you hired."

I was faced with the classic sales negotiation dilemma: I wanted the deal, but did I have to drop my fee to get it? What, I wondered, was really going on? I could envision the following scenarios:

a. The buyer was telling me the truth. If I lowered my fee, I might have a better chance of beating out the competition.

b. There was no competitor. The buyer was using the "squeeze" tactic ("We can get a better deal elsewhere") as a negotiating ruse to move my fee downward.

c. This was a test of my own negotiating skills. The potential client wanted to find out whether I practiced what I preached, and how I would respond when challenged on price.

d. The company had already decided to go with my competitor. They wanted a lower number from me to give them leverage in negotiating the competitor's fee.

What would you have done? Would you have caved in and lowered your fee?

I admitted to myself that I didn't know exactly what the situation was. Fortunately, I had enough prospects and clients "in the pipeline" to justify the decision I made on what to do next.

I decided that, if I lowered my fee, the client's perception of my services would almost certainly drop, but that if I held to the price I had offered, I would at least send a positive message and have some chance to do business with Susan's company in the future.

When I called my contact back, I politely refused to play ball. "I'm really sorry, Susan," I told her. "I'd love to work with you, but I can't destroy the credibility of my fee structure. My other clients will be upset if they find out that I gave you a discount." (This was certainly true.) Susan said she understood and would get back to me.

A week later, Susan informed me that they had selected my competitor. "That's too bad," I said. "Please call me if I can help in any way."

Two weeks after that, Susan called back and said that management had experienced a change of heart. The job was mine.

After the first seminar, I sat down with Susan and talked with her about the decision-making process. "Was there really another company that your boss liked?" I asked. "Oh yes," she said. "In fact, they wanted to do business with our company so badly, they offered to put on the first seminar for nothing."

"For nothing!" I repeated. "That's quite an offer. If you were so concerned about the fee, why didn't you accept?"

"For the best of reasons," Susan replied. "When they offered to do the seminar for nothing, our perception of the value of their seminar was that it was worth the price. Namely, nothing."

My seminar had been perceived as being more valuable, thanks to my confident negotiating posture. The lesson is clear: If you present your price with confidence, and you are willing to walk away if necessary, the prospect will often conclude that you must be worth it. Like everything in sales, this approach will not work all the time. But it will work often enough -- if you are negotiating from a position of strength. To do that, of course, you must make prospecting and new business development a part of your daily routine.

The bottom line: Brodow's Law says, "Always be willing to walk away from a negotiation." In other words, never negotiate without options. For salespeople, this means that you must have enough prospects so that you can comfortably say the magic word: "Next!"


Ed Brodow is a keynote speaker and negotiation guru on PBS, ABC News, Fox News, and Inside Edition. He is the author of Negotiation Boot Camp: How to Resolve Conflict, Satisfy Customers, and Make Better Deals. For more information on his keynotes and seminars, call 831-372-7270, e-mail ed@brodow.com, and visit Brodow.com.


Negotiation Boot Camp® (831) 372-7270ed@brodow.com

Home | Seminars | Sales Seminars | Webinars | Keynotes | Clients | Ed Brodow Bio | Books & DVDs | Articles | Video

Negotiation Boot Camp® is a registered Service Mark of Ed Brodow.
Copyright © 2001-2017 Ed Brodow. All rights reserved.